[1] Tegene D, Mohammed K, Amana K. The prevalence of post-term pregnancy and its associated factors at Adama Hospital Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Reproductive Health. 2022;14(01):9-.
[2] Wennerholm U-B, Saltvedt S, Wessberg A, Alkmark M, Bergh C, Wendel SB, et al. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial. bmj. 2019;367.
[3] Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, Van Den Akker T, Rydahl E, Beeckman K, Bogaerts A, Binfa L, et al. Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: a multinational cross-sectional study. PLoS medicine. 2020;17(5):e1003103.
[4] Sanchez-Ramos L, Levine LD, Sciscione AC, Mozurkewich EL, Ramsey PS, Adair CD, et al. Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023.
[5] Alkmark M, Keulen JK, Kortekaas JC, Bergh C, Van Dillen J, Duijnhoven RG, et al. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials. PLoS medicine. 2020;17(12):e1003436.
[6] Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, Crowther CA, Gomersall JC. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020(7).
[7] Alkmark M, Wennerholm UB, Saltvedt S, Bergh C, Carlsson Y, Elden H, et al. Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: a cost‐effectiveness analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2022;129(13):2157-65.
[8] Koenigbauer JT, Schalinski E, Jarchau U, Gauger U, Brandt K, Klaucke S, et al. Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2021;49(7):797-805.
[9] El-Khayat W, Alelaiw H, El-Kateb A, Elsemary A. Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction-Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine-Vol. 29, 3-p. 487-492. 2017.
[10] Khero RB, Jhulan MH, Farzana R, Karim K, Rafique M. Comparision of Mean Duration of Induction to Delivery in Isosorbide Mononitrate (Imn) plus Misoprostol between Misoprostol alone in Post-Term Pregnancies. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022;16(02):293-.
[11] Sakna NA, Mohamed AA, Moussa KS, Atek AM. Efficacy of Intravaginal Administration of Isosorbide Mononitrate Together with Misoprostol versus Misoprostol Alone in The Induction of Labor in Postdate Women. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2023;92:6070-4.
[12] Rai R, Basnet P, Thakur A, Pradhan T. Vaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening prior to induction of labor for postdated pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences. 2018;1(1):51-8.
[13] Mirteimouri M, Pourali L, Najaf Najafi M, Ghaffarian Omid M. Intravaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancy: a randomised clinical trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020;40(6):792-6.
[14] Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane, 2023. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. [Internet]. [cited 5 March 2024].
[15] Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, Thomas J. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2019;2019(10).
[16] Barat S, Esmaeilzadeh S, Ghanbarpour A, Baes M, Golsorkhtabaramiri M. Addition of isosorbide mononitrate to misoprostol for cervical ripening in post-term pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial. Clínica e Investigación en Ginecología y Obstetricia. 2022;49(2):100737.
[17] Nazir S, Ishfaq S, Tahir R, Tariq S, Munir S. Comparison of Isosorbide Mononitrate (IMN) Plus Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone in Post-Term Pregnancies. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022;16(05):919-.
[18] Makvandi S, Karimi L, Safyari M, Larki M. Efficacy and safety of isosorbide mononitrate plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the management of the first and second trimester abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2024;24(1):419.
[19] Dave A, Mourya P, Dave A. Role of Isosorbide Mononitrate as an Agent for Cervical Ripening in Second-trimester Abortions. Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2021;13(5):311-5.
[20] Chanrachakul B, Herabutya Y, Punyavachira P. Randomized trial of isosorbide mononitrate versus misoprostol for cervical ripening at term. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2002;78(2):139-45.
[21] Ghosh A, Lattey KR, Kelly AJ. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016(12).
[22] Abu-Zaid A, Alshahrani MS, Al-Matary A, Khadawardi K, Miski NT, Abuzaid M, et al. Isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening during labour induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2022;276:38-46.