Operating Room Nurses' Lived Experience of the Phenomenon of "Retained Surgical Items" In Patients' Bodies: A Phenomenological Study

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 Student Operating Room (MSc), Student Research Committee, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Operating Room, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

3 Student Operating Room (MSc), Student Research Committee, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

10.22038/nnj.2024.79028.1442

Abstract

Background and Aims: Today, despite the use of protocols and checklists related to surgical safety, the phenomenon of "retained surgical items" is still reported as one of the complications of surgeries. Despite its low incidence, this complication has irreparable consequences for the patient and the health system. Therefore, this study was conducted to explain the lived experience of operating room nurses regarding the phenomenon of "retained surgical items" in patients' bodies.
Materials and Methods: This qualitative study used a descriptive phenomenological method in 2023-2024 in all Hamedan University of Medical Sciences affiliated hospitals. Ten operating room nurses were selected using purposeful and snowball sampling methods. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews, and then data analysis was done using the Colaizzi method.
Results: After analyzing the data, 2 main themes and 5 sub-themes related to "retained surgical items" were extracted. The two main themes are mental and emotional reactions and professional attitude.
Conclusion: Considering the importance of patient safety on the one hand and the increasing spread of surgeries worldwide on the other, the results of our study are expected to increase by revealing the attitude and psychological reactions of operating room nurses while helping them improve their weak points. The quality of care in the surgery field will help increase patients' safety in the mentioned field.

Keywords


[1]       Dobson GP. Trauma of major surgery: A global problem that is not going away. Int J Surg. 2020;81:47-54.
[2]        Cockburn T, Davis J, Osborne S. Retained Surgical Items: Lessons from Australian Case Law of Items Unintentionally Left Behind in Patients after Surgery. Journal of law and medicine. 2019;26(4):841-8.
[3]        Kizer KW, Stegun MB. Advances in Patient Safety
Serious Reportable Adverse Events in Health Care. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 4: Programs, Tools, and Products). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005.
[4]        Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;348(3):229-35.
[5]        Bani-Hani KE, Gharaibeh KA, Yaghan RJ. Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma). Asian journal of surgery. 2005;28(2):109-15.
[6]        Gluncic V, Lukić A, Candido K. Retained surgical items: Implications for anesthesiology practice. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2019;58:83.
[7]        Kopka L, Fischer U, Gross AJ, Funke M, Oestmann JW, Grabbe E. CT of retained surgical sponges (textilomas): pitfalls in detection and evaluation. Journal of computer-assisted tomography. 1996;20(6):919-23.
[8]        Stawicki SP, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Ahmed HM, Anderson HL, 3rd, Balija TM, Bernescu I, et al. Retained surgical items: a problem yet to be solved. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013;216(1):15-22.
[9]        Lincourt AE, Harrell A, Cristiano J, Sechrist C, Kercher K, Heniford BT. Retained foreign bodies after surgery. The Journal of surgical research. 2007;138(2):170-4.
[10]      Zejnullahu VA, Bicaj BX, Zejnullahu VA, Hamza AR. Retained surgical foreign bodies after surgery. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;5(1):97.
[11]      Commission J. Preventing unintended retained foreign objects. Sentinel Event Alert. 2013(51):1-5.
[12]      Cima RR, Kollengode A, Garnatz J, Storsveen A, Weisbrod C, Deschamps C. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2008;207(1):80-7.
[13]      Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A, Weinberg A, Curty J, Rabin-Fastman B, et al. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Annals of surgery. 2008;247(1):13-8.
[14]      Munday J, Delaforce A, Heidke P, Grady C, Rademakers S, Smith H. Australian College of Perioperative Nurses Ltd (ACORN). Standard for perioperative nursing in Australia. Management of Hypothermia in the Perioperative Environment. 2018:103-9.
[15]      Imani B, Kermanshahi SMK, Vanaki Z, Kazemnejad Lili A. Hospital nurses’ lived experiences of intelligent resilience: A phenomenological study. Journal of clinical nursing. 2018;27(9-10):2031-40.
[16]      Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. 1978.
[17]      Cima RR, Bearden BA, Kollengode A, Nienow JM, Weisbrod CA, Dowdy SC, et al. Avoiding retained surgical items at an academic medical center: sustainability of a surgical quality improvement project. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2022;37(3):236-45.
[18]      Moffatt-Bruce SD, Cook CH, Steinberg SM, Stawicki SP. Risk factors for retained surgical items: a meta-analysis and proposed risk stratification system. journal of surgical research. 2014;190(2):429-36.
[19]      Kaplan HJ, Spiera ZC, Feldman DL, Shamamian P, Portnoy B, Ioannides P, et al. Risk reduction strategy to decrease incidence of retained surgical items. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2022;235(3):494-9.
[20]      Weprin S, Crocerossa F, Meyer D, Maddra K, Valancy D, Osardu R, et al. Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review. Patient Safety in Surgery. 2021;15:1-10.
[21]      Steelman VM, Shaw C, Shine L, Hardy-Fairbanks AJ. Unintentionally retained foreign objects: a descriptive study of 308 sentinel events and contributing factors. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2019;45(4):249-58.
[22]      Hibbert PD, Thomas MJ, Deakin A, Runciman WB, Carson-Stevens A, Braithwaite J. A qualitative content analysis of retained surgical items: learning from root cause analysis investigations. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2020;32(3):184-9.
[23]      Freitas PS, Silveira RCdCP, Clark AM, Galvão CM. Surgical count process for prevention of retained surgical items: an integrative review. Journal of clinical nursing. 2016;25(13-14):1835-47.
[24]      Mahdood B, Bastami M, Jalal SB, Merajikhah A, Imani B. Contributing Factors Affecting the Counting Error in the Operating Room: A Qualitative Study. Avicenna journal of Care and Health in Operating Room. 2023;1(2):61-70.