The CIPP a Model for Evaluation

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, & Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Ph.D. candidate of nursing, School of Nursing, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aims: Evaluation is essential to ensure the success of the organization. Approach Orinted-Management is one of the most important approaches to serving managers who are responsible for planning, implementing, and evaluating programs. The CIPP model has been distinguished from other models due to its comprehensiveness, continuity and, also the purpose of this model, which is a decision guide in program management (but, there is not enough knowledge about it). Therefore, in this article, the CIPP model and its components are studied.
Materials and Methods: This is a narrative review article. First, the keywords of evaluation models, approach oriented-management, and CIPP model were searched in available databases including Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed and SID, also, textbooks of management and educational evaluation were assessed in 1980-2021. Finally, 23sources including English and Persian books and articles were used to collect
Results: CIPP stands for four different dimensions of the model, which respectively are: Context, contextual evaluation and indicates the extent to which the context is conducive to program formation. Input, this indicates the evaluation of the input. It is a tool for identifying and evaluating competitive applications and can best meet identified needs. The process represents the process evaluation that evaluates and guides the implementation of projects. Product refers to output evaluation. This step, measures, interprets, and judges project results and interpret their merit, value, importance, and correctness.
Conclusion: CIPP model is one of the oriented-management models and helps managers and decision makers to successfully implement plans and how to achieve their aims. This model is recommended as a framework to guide the concept, design, implementation, and evaluation of training programs, systematically

Keywords

References

[1]   Karimi Moonaghi H, Yazdi Moghaddam H. Role modeling and mentor in nursing education. Research in Medical Education. 2014;6(1):59-71. [In persian].
[2]               Karimi Mooneghi H, Dabbaghi F, Oskouei F, Vehviläinen Julkunen K. Learning style in theoretical courses: nursing students’ perceptions and experiences Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2009;9(1):41-54. [In persian].
[3]               Tohidi SH, Norozi HM, Karimi Monegi H, Behnam Vashani HR. Correlation between nurses' self -assessment scores with the scores observed in the performance of their teaching competency in patient education. The Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty. 2015;13(7):588-95. [In persian].
[4]               Yazdani N, Moradi M. Evaluation of the quality of undergraduate nursing education program in Ahvaz based on CIPP evaluation model. Sadra Medical Sciences Journal. 2017;5(3):159-71. [In persian].
[5]               Hoseini BL, Jafarnejad F, Mazloum SR, Foroughipour M, Karimi Mouneghi H. Midwifery students' satisfaction with logbook as a clinical assessment means in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 2010. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2012;11(8):933-41. [In persian].
[6]               Delina M, Supriyati Y, editors. Evaluation of blended learning program physics of mechanical wave materials using CSE-UCLA model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series; 2021: IOP Publishing.
[7]               Amin Khandaghi M, Ajam AA. Reflecting on the theoretical connection between educational evaluation approaches and educational quality models and its practical consequences. Higher Education Letter. 2011;4(13):47-73. [In persian].
[8]               Hakan K, Seval F. CIPP evaluation model scale: development, reliability and validity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;15:592-9.
[9]               fathabadi J, Mohammadi arya A, Kakaie Y, Nozari M. Evaluation of Azad University of Gorgan based on context, input, process, product (CIPP) approach in academic year of 2006-2007. Journal of Reasearch Development in Nursing and Midwifery. 2012;8(2):58-68. [In persian].
[10]                                Hosseini S, Mohseni Band Pey A, Karami Matin B, Hosseini SA, Mirzaei Alavijeh M, Jalilian F. Comprehensive evaluation of Shahid Motahari Educational Festival during 2008-2013 based on CIPP Evaluation Model. The Journal of Medical Education and Development. 2014;9(2):56-68. [In persian].
[11]                                Saif AA. Educational measurement, assessment and evaluation. 4 ed. Tehran: Doran Publications; 2008. [In persian].
[12]                                Tuna H, Bas¸dal M. Curriculum evaluation of tourism undergraduate programs in Turkey: A CIPP model-based framework Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 2021;29:100324.
[13]                                Sopha S, Nanni A. The cipp model: Applications in language program evaluation. Journal of Asia TEFL. 2019;16(4):1360.
[14]                                Lippe M, Carter P. Using the CIPP model to assess nursing education program quality and merit. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2018;13(1):9-13.
[15]                                Ebrahimi M, hessami SK. Standardization, educational effectiveness and comparative comparison of evaluation models with the presentation of a comprehensive evaluation model. Journal of Standard and Quality Management. 2017;5(4):50-6. [In persian].
[16]                                Stufflebeam DL. The CIPP model for evaluation.  Evaluation Models: Springer; 2000. p. 279-317.
[17]                                Stufflebeam DL. The CIPP model for program evaluation.  Evaluation  Models: Springer; 1983. p. 117-41.
[18]                                Zhang G, Zeller N, Griffith R, Metcalf D, Williams J, Shea C, et al. Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement. 2011;15(4):57-84.
[19]                                Nikkhah M, Sharif M, Nasr aR, Talebi H. A feasibility study of using evaluation indicators of higher education in evaluation of the post-graduate curriculum, based on the CIPP-model. Biennial Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems. 2012;4(7):100-32. [In persian].
[20]                                Warju W. Educational program evaluation using CIPP model. INVOTEC. 2016;12(1):36-42.
[21]                                Akpur U, Alci B, Karatas H. Evaluation of the curriculum of english preparatory classes at Yildiz Technical University using CIPP model. Educational Research and Reviews. 2016;11(7):466-73.
[22]                                Basaran M, Dursun B, Gur Dortok HD, Yilmaz G. Evaluation of preschool education program according to CIPP model. Pedagogical Research. 2021;6(2).
[23]                                Aziz S, Mahmood M, Rehman Z. Implementation of CIPP model for quality evaluation at school level: a case study. Journal of Education and Educational Development. 2018;5(1):189-206.
Navid No
Volume 25, Issue 82
September 2022
Pages 91-101

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics