The difficulty of being voiceless and attempt for expressing needs among conscious mechanical ventilation patients in ICU: a qualitative study

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 Professor, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Conscious mechanically ventilated patients are not able to communicate due to the internal tubes and many other reasons which cause them to experience many difficulties. In this regard, the present study aimed to explore the experiences of conscious mechanically ventilated patients, such as speech impairment and discovery of nonverbal communication used by them for the expression of their needs.
Materials and Methods: This qualitative content analysis was conducted on 15 conscious mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the intensive care unit in Iran during 2016. The required data were collected through semi-structured interviews and observations and the subjects were selected using the purposive sampling method from patients with enough experience in this regard. Moreover, the collected data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis methods.
Results: Based on the results of data analysis, four main themes were found in the deep descriptions of the participants. These themes were the inability to speak as the root of problems, inconvenient blockage of communication channels, unsuccessful nonverbal communication, and attempt for communication.
Conclusion: Conscious patients in the intensive care unit have many communication problems while undergoing mechanical ventilation. Therefore, they are not able to express their own needs and this leads to fear and disappointment in them. These patients use different methods, such as communicating via signs, tapping on the bed, lip reading, and writing to express their needs.

Keywords

References

  1. Alasad J, Ahmad M. Communication with critically ill patients. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 50(4):356-62.
  2. Carruthersa H, Astinb F, Munro W. Which alternative communication methods are effective for voiceless patients in Intensive Care Units? A systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017; 42:88-96.
  3. Wojnicki–Johansson G. Communication between nurse and patient during ventilator treatment: patient reports and RN evaluations. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2001; 17(1):29–39.
  4. Carroll SM. Silent, slow lifeworld: the communication experience of nonvocal ventilated patients. Qualit Health Res. 2007; 17(9):1165-77.
  5. Magnus VS, Turkington L. Communication interaction in ICU-patient and staff experiences and perceptions. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006; 22(3):167-180.
  6. van de Leur JP, van der Schans CP, Loef BG, Deelman BG, Geertzen JH, Zwaveling JH. Discomfort and factual recollection in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care. 2004; 8(6):R467-73.
  7. Carroll SM. Nonvocal ventilated patients perceptions of being understood. West J Nurs Res. 2004; 26(1):85-112.
  8. Hofhuis JG, Spronk PE, van Stel HF, Schrijvers AJ, Rommes JH, Bakker J. Experiences of critically ill patients in the ICU. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008; 24(5):300-13.
  9. Finke EH, Light J, Kitko L. A systematic review of the effectiveness of nurse communication with patients with complex communication needs with a focus
    on the use of augmentative and alternative communication. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17(16):2102-15.
  10. Bartlett G, Blais R, Tamblyn R, Clermont RJ, MacGibbon B. Impact of patient communication problems on the risk of preventable adverse events in acute care settings. CMAJ. 2008; 178(12):1555-62.
  11. Patak L, Gawlinski A, Fung NI, Doering L, Berg J, Henneman EA. Communication boards in critical care: patients' views. Appl Nurs Res. 2006; 19(4):182-90.
  12. Happ MB, Roesch TK, Garrett K. Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: a feasibility study. Heart Lung. 2004; 33(2):92-101.
  13. Radtke JV, Baumann BM, Garrett KL, Happ MB. Listening to the voiceless patient: case reports in assisted communication in the intensive care unit. J Palliat Med. 2011; 14(6):791-5.
  14. Strubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2011.
  15. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
  16. Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Compan Qualit Res. 2004; 1(2004):159-76.
  17. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24(2):105-12.
  18. Boswell C, Cannon S. Introduction to nursing research (Incorporating evidence-based practice). Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publisher; 2011
  19. Wood GL, Harber J. Nursing research (Methods & critical appraisal for evidence-based practice). New York: Mosby Elsevier; 2010.
  20. Fredriksen ST, Ringsberg KC. Living the situation stress-experiences among intensive care patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2007; 23(3):124-31.
  21. Engström Å, Nyström N, Sundelin G, Rattray J. People's experiences of being mechanically ventilated in an ICU: a qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013; 29(2):88-95.
  22. Happ MB. Interpretation of nonvocal behavior and the meaning of voicelessness in critical care. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 50(9):1247-55.
Navid No
Volume 23, Issue 74
September 2020
Pages 19-31

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics