Digital Technology: A New Approach to Improve Maternal Health

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 PhD, Management and Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 PhD Candidate, Student Research Committee, Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The growing number of Internet users along with the emergence of a variety of digital media has created the potential to influence health behaviors. Women of childbearing age are increasingly using the Internet, social networks, and mobile apps, which provide a growing opportunity for mothers to improve their health during and after pregnancy. Moreover, digital technology has provided healthcare workers with a promising way to achieve their health prevention goals and promote healthy behaviors at the community level. Furthermore, its utilization in the health education system can enhance health services, create healthy living conditions, and help achieve the goals of improving public health and quality of life. Therefore, this review article aimed to explain the importance of using digital technology in maternal health education and elaborate the harms and obstacles in this process.

Keywords


  1. Aitken M, Clancy B, Nass D. The growing value of digital health: evidence and impact on human health and the healthcare system. New York: IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science; 2017.
  2. Molaei S, Hosseini M, Tabatabaee SM, Tafreshi MZ. Designing, producing and evaluating of educational multi-media application for the self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes. Indo Am J Pharm Sci. 2017; 4(5):1313-8.
  3. Moghaddasi H, Sajjadi S, Tabatabaei SM. Mobile health: an efficient service to promote selfcare among people introducing e-self-care. J Health Med Inform. 2016; 3(7):1-4.
  4. Kayyali R, Peletidi A, Ismail M, Hashim Z, Bandeira P, Bonnah J. Awareness and use of mHealth apps: a study from England. Pharmacy. 2017; 5(2):33.
  5. Marcolino MS, Oliveira JA, D'Agostino M, Ribeiro AL, Alkmim MB, Novillo-Ortiz D. The impact of mHealth interventions: systematic review of systematic reviews. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2018; 6(1):e23.
  6. Feroz A, Perveen S, Aftab W. Role of mHealth applications for improving antenatal and postnatal care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):704.
  7. Reports general dynamics (GD). Digital 2019: Global Internet Use Accelerates. Available at: URL: https://wearesocial.com/blog/2019/01/digital-2019-global-internet-use-accelerates; 2019.
  8. Vamos CA, Griner SB, Kirchharr C, Green SM, DeBate R, Daley EM, et al. The development of a theory-based eHealth app prototype to promote oral health during prenatal care visits. Transl Behav Med. 2019; 9(6):1100-11.
  9. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2012. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.
  10. Langlois ÉV, Miszkurka M, Zunzunegui MV, Ghaffar A, Ziegler D, Karp I. Inequities in postnatal care in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2015; 93(4):259-70. 
  11. Kabongo EM, Mukumbang FC, Delobelle P, Nicol E. Understanding the influence of the MomConnect programme on antenatal and postnatal care service utilisation in two South African provinces: a realist evaluation protocol. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(7):e029745.
  12. Abota TL, TadeleAtenafu N. Postnatal care utilization and associated factors among married women in Benchi-Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018; 28(3):267-76.
  13. Nurmatov UB, Lee SH, Nwaru BI, Mukherjee M, Grant L, Pagliari C. The effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low-and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2014; 4(1):010407.
  14. Watterson JL, Walsh J, Madeka I. Using mHealth to improve usage of antenatal care, postnatal care, and immunization: a systematic review of the literature. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:153402.
  15. Saronga NJ, Burrows T, Collins CE, Ashman AM, Rollo ME. mHealth interventions targeting pregnancy intakes in low and lower‐middle income countries: systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2019; 15(2): e12777.
  16. Bergström A, Fottrell E, Hopkins H, Lloyd D, Stevenson O, Willats P. mHealth: can mobile technology improve health in Lowand Middleincome countries. London: UCL Public Policy; 2015.
  17. Eysenbach G; CONSORT-EHEALTH Group. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(4):e126.
  18. Datta SS, Ranganathan P, Sivakumar KS. Study to assess the feasibility of text messaging service in delivering maternal and child healthcare messages in a rural area of Tamil Nadu, India. Australas Med J. 2014; 7(4):175-80.
  19. McNabb M, Chukwu E, Ojo O, Shekhar N, Gill CJ, Salami H, et al. Assessment of the quality of antenatal care services provided by health workers using a mobile phone decision support application in northern Nigeria: a pre/post-intervention study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0123940.
  20. Van Den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, Van Solinge WW, Lely AT, Franx A, et al. eHealth as the next-generation perinatal care: an overview of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(6):e202.
  21. Ren W, Huang C, Liu Y, Ren J. The application of digital technology in community health education. Digital Med. 2015; 1(1):3.
  22. Early J, Gonzalez C, Gordon-Dseagu V, Robles-Calderon L. Use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies and interventions among community health workers globally: a scoping review. Health Promot Pract. 2019; 20(6):805-17.