Personalizing the Content of Health Information Technology Courses Using Data Mining Techniques

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Medical Informatics, Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Records and Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Mashhad, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Personalization of educational content based on students' needs, conditions, and preferences is one of the most important trends in educational data mining. This study aimed to personalize the content of some courses based on the students’ views using a data mining technique.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 7th semester undergraduate students (in the last semester of theoretical course) (n=56) studying Health Information Technology in Mashhad, Semnan, and Ahvaz Universities of Medical Sciences, Iran. The participants were selected randomly, and the data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire. Validity of the questionnaire was verified by the Health Information Technology faculty members. The students were asked to suggest the preferred order for the most effective teaching of Health Information Technology course headings 1, 2, and 3. Moreover, they were asked to eliminate the headings that were not necessary.  Subsequently, genetic-based algorithms for data mining were used to extract the most frequent patterns from the presented sequences.
Results: In total, four frequent patterns were extracted from the collected data. The first group of the students suggested a common sequence for Health Information Technology course headings 1, 2, and 3. The second and third groups suggested a common sequence for parts of the “Health Information Technology 1” course. Eventually, no frequent patterns were extracted from the fourth group. Inappropriate headings, sequence of courses, references, content volume, and the method of presentation (theoretical and practical) were the most important factors in obtaining these results.
Conclusion: The analysis of the results by the experts showed that the proposed algorithm was useful in providing appropriate sequences of the educational content.

Keywords


  1. Chan AT, Chan SY, Cao J. SAC: a self-paced and adaptive courseware system. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Madison, WI, USA; 2001. P. 78-81.
  2. Qu C, Gamper J, Nejdl W. A collaborative courseware generating system based on webdav, xml, and jsp. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Madison, WI, USA; 2001. P. 197-8.
  3. Rodríguez G, Pérez J, Cueva S, Torres R. A framework for improving web accessibility and usability of open course ware sites. Comp Educ. 2017; 109:197-215.
  4. Anaya AR, Boticario JG. Application of machine learning techniques to analyse student interactions and improve the collaboration process. Exp Syst Appl. 2011; 38(2):1171-81.
  5. Brusilovsky P, Peylo C. Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. Int J Artific Intellig Educ. 2003; 13(4):159-72.
  6. Shin DH. User value design for cloud courseware system. Behav Inform Technol. 2015; 34(5):506-19.
  7. Hawryszkiewycz IT. Agent support for personalized learning services. Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Athens, Greece; 2003. P. 332-33.
  8. de-Marcos L, Martinez JJ, Gutiérrez JA, Barchino R, Hilera JR, Oton S, et al. Genetic algorithms for courseware engineering. Int J Innovat Comp Inform Control. 2011; 7(7):1-27.
  9. Brusilovsky P, Eklund J, Schwarz E. Web-based education for all: a tool for development adaptive courseware. Comp Networks ISDN Syst. 1998; 30(1-7):291-300.
  10. Carchiolo V, Longheu A, Malgeri M, Mangioni G. Courses personalization in an e-learning environment. Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Athens, Greece; 2003. P. 252-3.
  11. Lin X, Xin Z. Learning courseware design based on problem solving. 2010 International Conference on Optics, Photonics and Energy Engineering (OPEE), Wuhan, China; 2010. P. 166-9.
  12. Peng Y. SCORM-based courseware design for the personalization of e-learning system. Workshop on Intelligent Information Technology Application, Zhang Jiajie, China; 2007. P. 260-3.
  13. Bontchev B, Vassileva D. Courseware authoring for adaptive e-learning. International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, Singapore; 2009. P. 176-80.
  14. Vassileva J, Deters R. Dynamic courseware generation on the WWW. Br J Educ Technol. 1998; 29(1):5-14.
  15. Hajavi A, Sarbaz M, Moradi N. Medical records. Tehran: Publication of Iran University of Medical Sciences; 1991.
  16. Rezaee Gharahtekan M, Tayyeban M, Alizadeh M. Factors affecting discipline choice in students of medical records and health information technology in Mazandaran university of medical sciences in year 2010. Iran J Med Educ. 2012; 12(4):258-64.
  17. Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Available at: URL: www.behdasht.gov.ir; 2019.
  18. Han J, Pei J, Kamber M. Data mining: concepts and techniques. New York: Elsevier; 2011.
  19. Mahdi BJ, Fattaneh T. A longest common subsequence based genetic algorithm for courseware design. 4th International Conference on e-Learning and e-Teaching, Shiraz, Iran; 2003. P. 40-6.
  20. Edwin R. Courseware curriculum development project aligning outcome-based education across different curricular programs in Universidad de Zamboanga. J Eng Appl Sci. 2017; 12(21):5578-83.
  21. Chang KH, Bassue J. Green tricycle design through experiential learning-an open courseware enriching engineering curriculum and entrepreneurship. Comp Aided Design Appl. 2017; 14(6):823-32.
  22. Burbridge B, Kalra N, Malin G, Trinder K, Pinelle D. University of saskatchewan radiology courseware (USRC): an assessment of its utility for teaching diagnostic imaging in the medical school curriculum. Teach Learn Med. 2015; 27(1):91-8.