Ph.D. to MD Course around the world; Necessities, Evidence, and Suggested Curriculum in Iran

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 a.Ph.D. Candidate in Nutrition, Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran b,Ph.D. Candidate in Nutrition, Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Professor of Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Ph.D. Candidate in Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 Ph.D. Candidate in Nutrition, Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Associate Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

6 Assistant Professor of Health Education and Health Promotion, Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

7 Assistant Professor of Medical Bacteriology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

8 Assistant Professor of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran

9 Ph.D. Candidate in Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

10 Professor of Nutrition, Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: From the academic perspective, the differences between the educational curriculum of Medical Doctor (MD) and Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) are quite clear in basic medical sciences. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a more effective relationship between these two programs to provide better clinical services and conduct joint research projects. In this regard, the present study was conducted to review the evidences of the Ph.D. in medical sciences to MD course  in other countries and to make suggestions for set up this course in Iran.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted by reviewing the English articles published from 1960 to 2019 in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases using the keywords, such as "Ph.D." AND "MD" OR "Ph.D. to MD course" in combination with the "Curriculum" OR "Program" OR "Course".
Results: The results of the present study showed that the plans of the Ministry of Health in encouraging MD graduates to enter the Ph.D. courses in medical sciences have been effective in promoting clinical services. Therefore, this experience can be used to set up the Ph.D. to the MD course. Moreover, given the existence of the Ph.D. to MD course at some prestigious universities worldwide and considering the medical education program in Iran, this course can be set up at some internally accredited universities.    
Conclusion: It seems that launching the Ph.D. to MD courses in Iran as a 4-year course can provide an effective link between basic and clinical sciences, improve the quality of medical research, and increase the motivation of Ph.D. students and graduates.

Keywords

References

  1. Safari S, Safari E, Sarmadi M, Farajollahi M. The investigation of strategic planning models of universities (a case study: Iran’s Higher education). Educ Strateg Med. 2017; 10(5):397-406.
  2. Hosseini Nejad Z, Arabzadeh SA. Internal assessment of performance of medical major instruction in admission years 1994 to 1998. Strid Dev Med Educ. 2013; 3(2):102-10.
  3. Burns MK. Comprehensive system of assessment to intervention using curriculum-based assessments. Intervent Sch Clin. 2002; 38(1):8-13.
  4. Karle H. Global standards and accreditation in medical education: a view from the WFME. Acad Med. 2006; 81(12):S43-8.
  5. Brass LF, Akabas MH, Burnley LD, Engman DM, Wiley CA, Andersen OS. Are MD–PhD programs meeting their goals? An analysis of career choices made by graduates of 24 MD–PhD programs. Acad Med. 2010; 85(4):692-701.
  6. Restifo LL, Phelan GR. The cultural divide: exploring communication barriers between scientists and clinicians. Dis Model Mech. 2011; 4(4):423-6.
  7. Mehić B. Bridging between basic medical science and clinical practice. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2012; 12(1):3.
  8. Gray ML, Bonventre JV. Training PhD researchers to translate science to clinical medicine: closing the gap from the other side. Nature Med. 2002; 8(5):433.
  9. Koniaris LG, Cheung MC, Garrison G, Awad WM Jr, Zimmers TA. Perspective: PhD scientists completing medical school in two years: looking at the Miami PhD-to-MD program alumni twenty years later. Acad Med. 2010; 85(4):687-91.
  10. Raymond Sr JR, Kerschner JE, Hueston WJ, Maurana CA. The merits and challenges of three-year medical school curricula: time for an evidence-based discussion. Acad Med. 2015; 90(10):1318-23.
  11. Alamri Y. The combined medical/PhD degree: a global survey of physician-scientist training programmes. Clin Med. 2016; 16(3):215-8.
  12. Ryan PM. From bench to bedside: experiencing the transition from scientist to medical student. Int J Med Stud. 2017; 5(3):104-6.
  13. Raymond JR Sr, Kerschner JE, Hueston WJ, Maurana CA. The merits and challenges of three-year medical school curricula: time for an evidence-based discussion. Acad Med. 2015; 90(10):1318-23.
  14. Grover A, Niecko-Najjum LM. Building a health care workforce for the future: more physicians, professional reforms, and technological advances. Health Aff. 2013; 32(11):1922-7.
  15. Stewart PM, Bryan S, Dukes P, van Oudheusden HL, Walker R, Maxwell PH. What happens to clinical training fellows? A retrospective study of the 20 years outcome of a Medical Research Council UK cohort. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(4):e001792.
  16. Lockyer JM, Brzezina S, Thake J, Beck PL, Hollenberg MD, Hemmelgarn B, et al. Clinician scientists in Canada: supporting innovations in patient care through research. Ottawa, Canada: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2016.
  17. Abdollahi SH, Bakhshi H, EbrahimiShahmabadi H, SoltaniNejad A. The medical students' viewpoints in achieving clinical objectives of medical education program in Rafsanjan university of medical sciences in 2010: a short report. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2017; 15(11):1077-86.
  18. Finnerty EP, Chauvin S, Bonaminio G, Andrews M, Carroll RG, Pangaro LN. Flexner revisited: the role and value of the basic sciences in medical education. Acad Med. 2010; 85(2):349-55.
  19. Norman G. The basic role of basic science. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012; 17(4):453-6.
  20. Javadinia SA, Karimi G, Abedini MR. Training and evaluation in medicine effective or ineffective: establishing an educational culture based on community health priorities. Iran J Med Educ. 2014; 14(2):187-8.
  21. Alibeik MR, Kharabati Neshin M. A survey on scientometrics indicators of articles citing to researchers affiliated to Iranian type-one universities of medical sciences in web of science database during 2010-2014. Health Inform Manag. 2017; 14(4):146-80.
  22. Emami SM, Rasouli Nejad M, Changiz T, Afshin Nia F, Zolfaghari B, Adibi P. Interns' View about basic medical sciences: their knowledge and attitude to national comprehensive exam and basic medical courses in Isfahan university of medical sciences. Iran J Med Educ. 2000; 1(1):21-5.
  23. 3-Year PhD-to-MD program. Columbia. Available
    at: URL: https://www.ps.columbia.edu/education/
    academic-programs/doctoral-degree-programs/3-year-phd-md-program    ; 2019.
Navid No
Volume 22, Issue 72
March 2020
Pages 55-63

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics