Evaluation of the Staff Responsiveness Level to Patients Referred to Public and Private Hospitals in Mashhad during 2018

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 PhD, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 MD, General Director of Health Insurance of Khorasan Razavi Province, Health Insurance Department of Khorasan Razavi, Mashhad, Iran

3 MSc, Health Insurance Expert, Health Insurance Department of Khorasan Razavi, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Measurement of health system performance can provide decision-makers with timely and relevant information on the performance of this system. Accordingly, Iran's Ministry of Health and Medical Education has considered the issue of the country's health care system responsiveness in the third, fourth, and fifth health plans of the country. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the staff responsiveness level to patients referred to private and public Hospitals in Mashhad during 2018.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted based on an analytical method. The study population included patients referring to hospitals in Mashhad. The data were collected using a two-section standard responsiveness questionnaire (i.e., demographic information and eight responsiveness components) which was scored based on a Likert scale. Furthermore, the data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 20) through descriptive statistics (i.e., frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation), as well as t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficient. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: In total, 200 questionnaires were distributed in four public and three private hospitals. The mean total score of the responsiveness questionnaire was obtained at 3.4±0.8, which was assessed as moderate. Pearson correlation coefficient showed a significant relationship between the components of the questionnaire (P<0.001). Based on the results of the Student Test, a significant difference was observed between public and private hospitals regarding the total score and different components investigated in this study.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that patients rated the level of staff responsiveness as moderate in hospitals in Mashhad. Therefore, there is a capacity to improve the staff responsiveness levels in these hospitals.
 

Keywords

References

  1. Amerioun A, Teymourzadeh  E, Alijanzadeh M, Hakimzadeh S, Hosseini Shokouh S. Research Needs Assessment and Priority Setting for Health Economics: A Mixed method Study in Iran. Journal of Military Medicine. 2014;16(1):23-8.
  2. Hadavi M, Asadpour M, Razaeian M. Research Barriers from the Perspective of Academic Members and Strategies for Confronting with These Barriers in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Journal of Health System Research 2012;9(3):269-76.
  3. Hodavand S. Country Research Challenges and its Impact on the Elimination of Immigration. Tadbir. 2005;216:44.
  4. Pariad R. Study of the structural barriers of research among faculty members of human sciences departments of Isfahan and western countries. Proceedings of Higher Education and Sustainable Development. 2005;2: 258 - 33.
  5. SAbori A. Iranian Research Report in 2005. Rahyaft. 2007;37:48.
  6. Ghanei M, Eftekhari MB, Peykari N, Djalalinia Sh, Owlia P, Habibi E, et al. Health research system evaluation in IR of Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2012;15(7):394–9.
  7. Djalalinia S, Owlia P, Forouzan AS, Habibi E, Dejman M, Eftekhari MB, et al. Health research evaluation and its role on knowledge production. Iran J Public Health. 2012;
    41(2):39–46.
  8. Owlia P, Eftekhari MB, Forouzan AS, Bahreini F, Farahani M, M. G. Health research priority setting in Iran: Introduction to a bottom up approach. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16(5):691–8.
  9. Iran Health Insurance Organization. Introduction of Iran Health Insurance Organization. http://www.bimehsalamat.
    ir/sso/2017    .
  10. Rashidian A, Kavosi Z, Majdzadeh R, Pourreza A, Pourmalek F, Arab M, et al. Assessing health system responsiveness: a household survey in 17th District of Tehran. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2011;13(5):302-8.
  11. Karami Tanha F, Fallah Abadi H. Health system responsiveness for care of patients with heart failure: evidence form a universityhospital. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2014; 17(11):736-40. doi:0141711/AIM.003.
  12. Valentine N, Darby C, Bonsel GJ. Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO’s general population surveys of “health systems responsiveness” in 41 countries. Social Science & Medicine. 2008; 66(9):1939-50. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.12.002.
  13. Mirzaei Alavijeh M, Mazloomy Mahmodabad S, Hosseini P, Abbasi Shuvazi M, F. R. A Survey of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences Students' Opinions about Research Barriers during University Training. Journal of Medical Education Development Zanjan. 2012;6(10):63 – 70.
  14. Anbari Z, Jadidi RA. Comparing of Barriers to Research Activities among Students of Arak University of Medical Sciences, and Appropriate Strategies for Student Research Management. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2013;13(5):399 - 412.
  15. Vakili A, Mehr Alizadeh S, Pour Hoseyni SM. View of academics of Faculty of Medicine of Semnan University of Medical Sciences towards student research The Journal of Medical Education and Development Yazd. 2011;6(1):11 - 6.
  16. Gohari M, Tabibi SJ, Nasiripour A, M. M, . Seven Dimensions Of Accountability In Iran’s Teaching Hospitals: A National Study. Payavard Salamat. 2015;6(4):255-64.
  17. Ferdosi M, Dehnavieh R, Faraji F, Yarmohammadian MH, al. e. Utilization of Research Results at Office of Deputy Minister for Management and Resources Development in the Past Five Years and Identification of Obstacle. Health Information Management 2009;6(2):152-61.
  18. Javadi M, Karimi S, Raiesi A, Yaghoubi M, Kaveh K. Comparison of patients’ and nurses’ viewpoints about responsiveness among a sample from public and private hospitals of Isfahan. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2011; 16(4):273-7.
  19. Ministry of Health. Third and fourth development plans. Available at: URL: http://www.irannsr.org/ services/nsr_Rules/
    1743; 2010. [in Persian]
  20. Timori Nejad K. Accountability system in the municipality
    of Tehran: research on how urban servicesand citizen satisfaction. Tehran: Alame Tabatabai University, School of Accounting and Management; 2014. [in Persian]
  21. Njeru MK, Blystad A, Nyamongo IK, Fylkesnes K. A critical assessment of the WHO responsiveness tool: lessons from voluntary HIV testing and counseling services in India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;9:243.
  22. Peltzer K, Phaswana-Mafuya N. Patient experiences and health system responsiveness among older adults in South Africa. Global Health Action. 2012; 5(2):18545.
  23. De Silva A. A framework for measuring responsiveness. Geneva W, Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy. 2016 (unpublished paper).
  24. Valentine NB BG, Murray CJ. Measuring quality of health care from the user’s perspective in 41 countries: psychometric properties of whose questions on health systems responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2017; 16(7): 1107–25.
  25. Kowal P NN, Williams S, Chatterji S. Performance of the health system in China and Asia as measured by responsiveness. Health. 2011; 3(10): 638-46.
  26. Liabsuetrakul T, Petmanee P, Sanguanchua S, Oumudee N. Health system responsiveness for delivery care in Southern Thailand. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24(2):169-75.
Navid No
Volume 22, Issue 71
December 2019
Pages 1-10

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics